Political Science and International Law — don’t fall for either. They’re good for brief instances of argumentation. Are you stuck on the principled value of ‘Ukrainian sovereignty’ and on the consequence of that sovereign identity to Europe and European identity? I give you ‘Yugoslavian sovereignty.’ Meh. Would you feel a moral imperative to fight (using NATO maybe) for the sovereignty of Georgia? Armenia? Azerbaijan? Any of the stans? Is Uti Possidetis that big a deal? Here are a few thoughts on that from a guy who did some thinking on that: Steven R. Ratner, “Drawing a Better Line: Uti Possidetis and the Borders of New States,” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 90, No. 4 (Oct., 1996), pp. 590-624 (35 pages). I have no idea how Mr. Ratner feels about Ukrainian sovereign identity, but I think it’s worth something. I just don’t think it has to have all the square miles assigned to it that the Russians assigned to it before 1991.
Meta
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Holmes Oliver on Great Again Begins
- Ivan Burl Welch on Great Again Begins
- Carla Marks on Calling it Now
- Cullen on My Opinion
- Geoff Demarest on My Opinion
Categories
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- July 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- April 2022
- January 2018
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- June 2016
Calendar
-